1:54 p.m.
As well as LDAP config from RealmModel and admin console?
On 7/31/2014 2:23 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
2:26 p.m.
+1, I've did some testing of ActiveDirectory with latest picketlink and
UserFederationProvider and works fine.
But do you also want to remove picketlink modules? I would personally
keep them to allow people to init picketlink PartitionManager from
different location ? Good thing on LDAPFederationProvider is, that it's
defacto not tightly coupled to LDAP but it's using picketlink, so it can
be used to federate users from any picketlink IdentityStore.
So far in my local "picketlink-master" fork, I've changed
UserFederationProvider to use those to obtain PartitionManager and I
removed stuff you copied before from it (like PartitionManagerRegistry
etc). I hope to merge it early on Monday before you join online. wdyt?
Marek
On 31.7.2014 20:54, Bill Burke wrote:
As well as LDAP config from RealmModel and admin console?
On 7/31/2014 2:23 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
2:51 p.m.
On 7/31/2014 3:26 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
+1, I've did some testing of ActiveDirectory with latest
picketlink and
UserFederationProvider and works fine.
But do you also want to remove picketlink modules?
We don't have to remove them, but the non-abstract classes are LDAP
specific.
I would personally
keep them to allow people to init picketlink PartitionManager from
different location ? Good thing on LDAPFederationProvider is, that it's
defacto not tightly coupled to LDAP but it's using picketlink, so it can
be used to federate users from any picketlink IdentityStore.
It is tightly coupled with LDAP at least what is in trunk.
So far in my local "picketlink-master" fork, I've
changed
UserFederationProvider to use those to obtain PartitionManager and I
removed stuff you copied before from it (like PartitionManagerRegistry
etc). I hope to merge it early on Monday before you join online. wdyt?
I've been doing some work with LDAPFederationProvider today. If you
don't think it can be done by Monday, then it can hold off until after
Beta 4 release.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
3:42 p.m.
On 31.7.2014 21:51, Bill Burke wrote:
On 7/31/2014 3:26 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
> +1, I've did some testing of ActiveDirectory with latest picketlink and
> UserFederationProvider and works fine.
>
> But do you also want to remove picketlink modules?
We don't have to remove them, but the non-abstract classes are LDAP
specific.
> I would personally
> keep them to allow people to init picketlink PartitionManager from
> different location ? Good thing on LDAPFederationProvider is, that it's
> defacto not tightly coupled to LDAP but it's using picketlink, so it can
> be used to federate users from any picketlink IdentityStore.
>
It is tightly coupled with LDAP at least what is in trunk.
> So far in my local "picketlink-master" fork, I've changed
> UserFederationProvider to use those to obtain PartitionManager and I
> removed stuff you copied before from it (like PartitionManagerRegistry
> etc). I hope to merge it early on Monday before you join online. wdyt?
>
I've been doing some work with LDAPFederationProvider today. If you
don't think it can be done by Monday, then it can hold off until after
Beta 4 release.
I can easily update picketlink and do this on Monday. Not sure if
will
be able to finish sync by Monday or rather from Monday focus on testing
/ bugfixing?
Marek
3801
days inactive
3801
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bill Burke -
Marek Posolda