1:58 p.m.
Finish up as many jiras as possible then release 1.1.Beta1 on Monday?
Nice feature list:
* Deep clustering support
* SAML 2.0 support
* Tomcat 7 adapter
* Multi-tenant adapter???
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
2:14 p.m.
Monday should be OK.
I've got to review and merge the multi-tenant adapter support and also add the
proposed changes to access codes, but shouldn't be a problem to finish those in time.
For https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-708 I think we should just make sure the
adapters checks sql-required before talking to KC. Currently I think the adapters will
fetch the realm key from http://keycloak even if sql-required is set to all.
How about Stan's work? If we're including that I'd prefer a few more days to
try it out. It's a relatively big change to the appliance-dist right?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014 7:58:02 PM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.1 Beta 1 monday?
Finish up as many jiras as possible then release 1.1.Beta1 on Monday?
Nice feature list:
* Deep clustering support
* SAML 2.0 support
* Tomcat 7 adapter
* Multi-tenant adapter???
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
2:18 p.m.
On 10/29/2014 3:14 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Monday should be OK.
I've got to review and merge the multi-tenant adapter support and also add the
proposed changes to access codes, but shouldn't be a problem to finish those in time.
For https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-708 I think we should just make sure the
adapters checks sql-required before talking to KC. Currently I think the adapters will
fetch the realm key from http://keycloak even if sql-required is set to all.
The server url needs to be specified correctly (with HTTPS). This is
not a bug. I rejected it.
How about Stan's work? If we're including that I'd prefer
a few more days to try it out. It's a relatively big change to the appliance-dist
right?
Did he merge it?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
2:38 p.m.
On 10/29/2014 3:18 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 10/29/2014 3:14 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Monday should be OK.
>
> I've got to review and merge the multi-tenant adapter support and also add the
proposed changes to access codes, but shouldn't be a problem to finish those in time.
>
> For https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-708 I think we should just make sure the
adapters checks sql-required before talking to KC. Currently I think the adapters will
fetch the realm key from http://keycloak even if sql-required is set to all.
>
The server url needs to be specified correctly (with HTTPS). This is
not a bug. I rejected it.
> How about Stan's work? If we're including that I'd prefer a few more days
to try it out. It's a relatively big change to the appliance-dist right?
>
Did he merge it?
I did a PR, but Stain said he wanted to look it over first before
merging.
It's probably not a bad idea to have one or two folks try it out before
we do a release.
2:58 p.m.
On 10/29/2014 3:38 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
On 10/29/2014 3:18 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> On 10/29/2014 3:14 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> Monday should be OK.
>>
>> I've got to review and merge the multi-tenant adapter support and also add
the proposed changes to access codes, but shouldn't be a problem to finish those in
time.
>>
>> For https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-708 I think we should just make sure
the adapters checks sql-required before talking to KC. Currently I think the adapters will
fetch the realm key from http://keycloak even if sql-required is set to all.
>>
> The server url needs to be specified correctly (with HTTPS). This is
> not a bug. I rejected it.
>
>> How about Stan's work? If we're including that I'd prefer a few more
days to try it out. It's a relatively big change to the appliance-dist right?
>>
> Did he merge it?
I did a PR, but Stain said he wanted to look it over first before merging.
It's probably not a bad idea to have one or two folks try it out before
we do a release.
Is this usable with Wildfly 8.1.0?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
6:30 p.m.
On 10/29/2014 3:58 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 10/29/2014 3:38 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 3:18 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> On 10/29/2014 3:14 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> Monday should be OK.
>>>
>>> I've got to review and merge the multi-tenant adapter support and also
add the proposed changes to access codes, but shouldn't be a problem to finish those
in time.
>>>
>>> For https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-708 I think we should just make
sure the adapters checks sql-required before talking to KC. Currently I think the adapters
will fetch the realm key from http://keycloak even if sql-required is set to all.
>>>
>> The server url needs to be specified correctly (with HTTPS). This is
>> not a bug. I rejected it.
>>
>>> How about Stan's work? If we're including that I'd prefer a few
more days to try it out. It's a relatively big change to the appliance-dist right?
>>>
>> Did he merge it?
> I did a PR, but Stain said he wanted to look it over first before merging.
>
> It's probably not a bad idea to have one or two folks try it out before
> we do a release.
Is this usable with Wildfly 8.1.0?
Yes, definitely. The PR includes changing the appliance dist to use
this and the appliance dist is still on 8.1.0. That's what I've been
testing on.
3706
days inactive
3706
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bill Burke -
Stan Silvert -
Stian Thorgersen