My sincere hope is that the change sets used to pre-populate the database with static data
is all developers will have to manage. So far so good, but the live DB requirement was a
surprise.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 3:06 AM, Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Makes sense. I've long lamented that I didn't spend more
time naming stuff in the JPA layer. So I think this is a happy change.
It's sad to learn that a live DB is needed to create the change sets. We do have
access to some live DB instances (of various types) here at RH - we can check them out and
use them for this purpose if necessary.
The DB types we have available:
DB2, sqlsrvr, mysql, oracle, postgres, sybase. And we have multiple versions of each.
If live DBs are required, then obviously creating changesets may continue to be a largely
manual process.
-Eric