On 18 August 2016 at 19:26, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 8/18/16 1:13 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
One problem with this approach is that you end up having a separate JDBC
connection and transaction even if it uses the same database the Keycloak
server uses.
Something we have to fix anyways. Its on my todo list.
Take a look at
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/examples/
providers/domain-extension/src/main/java/org/keycloak/
examples/domainextension/jpa for example which allows adding custom
entities to the main EntityManager.
I'm really not a big fan of this extension and this is something I do not
want to support for product ever.
Why, please elaborate? IMO it's a really nice and simple way to add a few
extra entities for custom providers.
Bill