8:30 a.m.
Correct, Maven Central is even simpler to use. Works ootb, no mangling with
settings.xml is required at all.
I asked for pushing RESTEasy to Maven Central in Nov 2011, needed for EAP6/WFK2.
There was the same clean up of pom.xml(s) back then.
Performance wise, I have no idea. I'm not experiencing any difference at all. If
you experience connection lags, you can always mirror Maven Central to a
different repo, such as JBoss Nexus -
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html.
Karel
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:45:20 -0500 (EST)
Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hosting on Maven Central means that folks can use Keycloak artifaces
without
having to add JBoss Nexus to their poms. So IMO it makes it slightly simpler
to add Keycloak deps.
RestEasy is on Maven Central
(http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cresteasy) ;)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 January, 2014 1:37:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak artifacts not in Maven Central
>
>
>
> On 1/30/2014 8:13 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> > I did some checks and there is some work needed:
> >
> > 1/ According to Maven Central rules, there should not be any
<repository>
> > elements in pom.xml files
>
>
> > 2/ When I removed them, org.jboss.web:jbossweb:jar:7.0.17.Final is not
> > available no Maven Central
> >
> > So, following steps are needed:
> >
> > * figure out whether jbossweb dependency could be replaced by something
> > else,
> > if not - it has to undergo same checks as keycloak and be synced to
> > Maven
> > Central or, which I prefer, to release it relocated to org.keycloak
> > groupId.
> > Given that 7.0.17.Final has do external dependencies at all -
> > seems much easier then trying to convince sonatype to pick a single
> > version
> > of jbossweb tree
> > * remove all <repositories> from pom.xml files
> >
>
> Would hosting at Maven Central require developers to configure their
> settings.xml, or can the build still run OOTB? A build running OOTB is
> more important than hosting at Maven Central.
>
> Also, what is the performance of Maven Central compared to
> repository.jboss.org? I've often had slow as balls connections to Maven
> Central and never any problems with repository.jboss.org. Finally,
> nobody has ever complained that Resteasy is not at Maven central.
> People have no problems using repository.jboss.org so I don't see what
> the big deal is.
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev