Q: I have other repositories or pluginRepositories listed in my POM, is that a
A: At present, this won't preclude your project from being included,
but we do strongly encourage making sure all your dependencies are included in
I believe its worth removing. Having *all* artifacts in two repo managers is
always better then relying on single one.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:09 -0500
Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Resteasy 3.0.6 master pom (downloaded from maven central) has
as a repository and also has a jboss-web dependency
so I don't understand why Keycloak can't be pushed to maven central.
On 1/30/2014 9:30 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> Correct, Maven Central is even simpler to use. Works ootb, no mangling with
> settings.xml is required at all.
> I asked for pushing RESTEasy to Maven Central in Nov 2011, needed for
> EAP6/WFK2. There was the same clean up of pom.xml(s) back then.
> Performance wise, I have no idea. I'm not experiencing any difference at
> all. If you experience connection lags, you can always mirror Maven Central
> to a different repo, such as JBoss Nexus -
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:45:20 -0500 (EST)
> Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hosting on Maven Central means that folks can use Keycloak artifaces
>> without having to add JBoss Nexus to their poms. So IMO it makes it
>> slightly simpler to add Keycloak deps.
>> RestEasy is on Maven Central
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 30 January, 2014 1:37:47 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak artifacts not in Maven Central
>>> On 1/30/2014 8:13 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
>>>> I did some checks and there is some work needed:
>>>> 1/ According to Maven Central rules, there should not be any
>>>> elements in pom.xml files
>>>> 2/ When I removed them, org.jboss.web:jbossweb:jar:7.0.17.Final is not
>>>> available no Maven Central
>>>> So, following steps are needed:
>>>> * figure out whether jbossweb dependency could be replaced by something
>>>> if not - it has to undergo same checks as keycloak and be synced to
>>>> Central or, which I prefer, to release it relocated to org.keycloak
>>>> Given that 7.0.17.Final has do external dependencies at all -
>>>> seems much easier then trying to convince sonatype to pick a single
>>>> of jbossweb tree
>>>> * remove all <repositories> from pom.xml files
>>> Would hosting at Maven Central require developers to configure their
>>> settings.xml, or can the build still run OOTB? A build running OOTB is
>>> more important than hosting at Maven Central.
>>> Also, what is the performance of Maven Central compared to
>>> repository.jboss.org? I've often had slow as balls connections to
>>> Central and never any problems with repository.jboss.org
>>> nobody has ever complained that Resteasy is not at Maven central.
>>> People have no problems using repository.jboss.org
so I don't see what
>>> the big deal is.
>>> Bill Burke
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev mailing list