Re: [resteasy-dev] Proposed changes to org.jboss.resteasy.client.jaxrs.engines.ApacheHttpClient4Engine

> Hi Rebecca,

> Following up on our discussion during today's meeting, changing that > constructor would introduce a new behavior that may break someone's code. > That was the point of the discussion in RESTEASY-975. So we have to come to > some decision about how to manage changes like this. Should we have, as you > suggested, a 3.0.x branch that maintains the current behavior, so that a > change like this can be introduced into master (or whatever ends up serving > as master for 3.1.x)? I'm fine with this. Let's use the minor version change for this. On a related topic, we should keep track of changes like this so that we can later prepare migration notes (when we'll be ready for releasing next minor).

Cheers Alessio -- Alessio Soldano Web Service Lead, JBoss

_______________________________________________ resteasy-dev mailing list resteasy-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev