A couple of other things I failed to mention.
On 1/30/2014 9:59 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
 Future tasks for the Keycloak Subsystem:
 * Integration with the Keycloak Admin
 * Review the attributes of realm and secure-deployment to make sure they
 align with keycloak.json. 
And also make sure that default boolean values are
correct.  Make sure
required fields are correctly marked as such.  Etc.
 * Fill in help text in
keycloak/subsystem/src/main/resources/org/keycloak/subsystem/extension/LocalDescriptions.properties
 * See comments in KeycloakAdapterConfigService.java.  This class may
 work better as a plain Singleton instead of a service. 
And also this class is not
currently thread-safe.  We could probably get
by with just making all the public methods synchronized.  The rare case
where thread safety matters is when two administrators are editing the
subsystem at the same time.  At startup, the initialization of all the
data is single-threaded.
 * It probably wouldn't hurt to ask Brian Stansberry to give the
 subsystem a quick review.
 * More tests
 * Package the subsystem with the distribution
 * Documentation
 _______________________________________________
 keycloak-dev mailing list
 keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev