Re: [keycloak-dev] Can I remove AuthenticationProvider now?

On 7/31/2014 3:26 PM, Marek Posolda wrote: > +1, I've did some testing of ActiveDirectory with latest picketlink and > UserFederationProvider and works fine. > > But do you also want to remove picketlink modules? We don't have to remove them, but the non-abstract classes are LDAP specific. > I would personally > keep them to allow people to init picketlink PartitionManager from > different location ? Good thing on LDAPFederationProvider is, that it's > defacto not tightly coupled to LDAP but it's using picketlink, so it can > be used to federate users from any picketlink IdentityStore. > It is tightly coupled with LDAP at least what is in trunk. > So far in my local "picketlink-master" fork, I've changed > UserFederationProvider to use those to obtain PartitionManager and I > removed stuff you copied before from it (like PartitionManagerRegistry > etc). I hope to merge it early on Monday before you join online. wdyt? > I've been doing some work with LDAPFederationProvider today. If you don't think it can be done by Monday, then it can hold off until after Beta 4 release.