3:09 a.m.
Hi Stian,
I agree with your assessment since all other sub-components within Keycloak
all use the same version. I would just like to clarify one point.
have the version identical to Keycloak upstream, and identical to RH-SSO
downstream
I was under the impression these were on different versions. Keycloak 7.0.1
and RH-SSO 7.3.2? A follow on question, how long after Keycloak 8.0.0 is
release does the next version of RH-SSO get released and will this also be
8.0.0?
Thanks
DAVID FFRENCH
Principal software engineer, CLOUD SERVICES
Red Hat Waterford <https://www.redhat.com/>
Communications House, Cork Road
Waterford, Ireland
dffrench(a)redhat.com
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:55 AM Sebastian Laskawiec <slaskawi(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Ok, you convinced me guys. Let's align it with Keycloak.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:08 AM Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:02 PM Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
>
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > During our stand-up meeting today we discussed the versioning of the
> > new Keycloak Operator. In summary, if the versioning should follow the
> > same scheme as semantic versioning, or follow our continuous delivery
> > model[1].
> >
> > The "old" Operator is actually on 1.9.4 and the new version should
be
> > 2.0.0. But if we use our current versioning scheme, that means a
> > significant bump, for example, 8.0.0.
> >
>
> +1 for version of the operator being aligned with the version of other
> components
> (server, adapters etc.), even if this will mean:
>
> - Operator version will need initially to get bumped substantially to
> match the Keycloak server version,
> - Operator would need to be released together with other components
this
> way (IOW any, even possible urgent Operator fixes would need to wait
for
> N+1 server release).
>
> This makes more sense / is more consistent IMHO, than keeping the
Operator
> version as a separate one.
> Besides that (as already mentioned) it removes the need in the future
> (maybe often?) to clarify, which
> Operator version matches which Keycloak server version.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Keycloak / RH-SSO Team
>
>
>
> >
> > I kind of know the answer :) But the team wanted to ask.
> >
> > [1] - https://www.keycloak.org/2019/04/versioning.html
> >
> > --
> > - abstractj
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev