Yeah, there might be some risk of regression. On the other hand, there
are DB queries during each social login or every time when you click on
"federated identities" in account management.
If you think missing caching is acceptable from performance perspective
etc, I can merge just to master and avoid 1.9.x.
Marek
On 22/03/16 17:18, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Is this really critical for 1.9.x? I'm worried about us intruding more
complexity so late and I'd rather postpone to 2.x.
On 22 Mar 2016 15:36, "Marek Posolda" <mposolda(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mposolda@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 22/03/16 15:18, Bill Burke wrote:
> Some comments on code:
>
> * Why have a special flag in invalidateUser? Just invalidate
the links
> if they exist. Aggressive eviction isn't a bad thing, is it?
The only reason was performance. The flag "false" is used when you're
adding new user. But this new user is not yet in cache, so calling
"getFederatedIdentities" will always need to send DB query to get all
links of user. But when you're adding new user, you know that this
user
doesn't yet have any social links. So in the end, without the flag
there
will be one more DB query, which will always return empty set.
Currently we don't support store/load of social links from federation
provider. But maybe in the future, if we support it and we chain cache
on top of federation storage, it could theoretically happen that new
user have social links at the moment when he is registered. So I
can do
what you proposed as it seems to be a bit safer for the future.
Marek
>
> On a side note, cache needs more refactoring, we're reusing the same
> pattern over and over. Wonder if functions can help.
>
>
> On 3/22/2016 5:42 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>> Until now, we don't have support for caching of identityProvider
>> (social) links. So every social login or every going to "federated
>> identities" tab in account management needs to send DB queries.
I was
>> looking at fixing it and I've send PR
>>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2404 . It turned to
be a bit
>> tricky because of:
>>
>> 1) Caching needs to be done on both directions. For social
login, you
>> need to lookup user by social link. But on the other hand, you
also need
>> to look all social/identityProvider links of particular user
when you go
>> to account management etc.
>>
>> 2) Because of "store token" option, the link may need to be
updated in
>> DB quite often (in theory even during each social login).
>>
>> I was thinking that storing links directly on CachedUser
doesn't work
>> very well, because during each update of social link (which may
be often
>> because of "store token") the user would need to be fully
invalidated
>> from cache. Having separate cache entry for each social link
also has
>> some downsides (many items in cache, need to have separate
entry for
>> store the all links of user anyway). So I ended up with having
the cache
>> entry, which contains list of all links of particular user. It
needs to
>> be updated when any social link is added,removed or updated.
This seemed
>> to me like good compromise. WDYT?
>>
>> There are also entries for lookup user by federated identity,
so you
>> don't need to query DB during social login.
>>
>> So ATM there are not DB queries during social login or during go to
>> "federated identities" . I hope I handled all corner cases and
>> invalidations correctly, but if someone want to take look it
will be
>> good. I don't want to add new regressions atm :-)
>>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev