Re: [keycloak-dev] Next step performance

From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, 30 May, 2014 12:29:23 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Next step performance On 5/30/2014 6:06 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: > Sent invite for Monday in Zimbra (15pm GMT). If that's not suitable let me > know. > > A few more areas to look at: > > * Profile to find crappy code > * Tune FreeMarker and themes > * Sharding / sticky sessions - this is probably for later, but I'd like to > discuss it in the hangout > > A few comments on database caching: > > * We may need to do this in stages > - 2nd level cache for beta-2? > - Something more advanced in after 1.0.final > * I'd don't like the idea of us re-inventing the wheel > - Caching has a lot of complex considerations (node discovery, > fail-over, node recovery, invalidation, lan/wan, jta, etc.) I know and agree and have experience with this. But, these traditional caches just don't work well in many environments. > * I really like the idea of having a cache model provider that delegates to > another model for persistence / this is definitively the way to go IMO > * User sessions needs to separate considerations, specifically I think we > can come up with something clever to minimise the writes required > Yes, User sessions are a special case. -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com