Interesting. So client templates could become a very flexible thing that
covers many uses. So one single concept could cover:
* Templates as today
* Scope
* Namespaces
I like the idea, but the devil is in the details. How would it end up
looking. Would it be easy to use.
On 27 September 2017 at 19:38, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Maybe want to allow client scopes to define their own roles too.
Then
we have a role namespace as well. Could even think about removing
realm roles if we do this.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Interesting idea. That might just work and be a nice and easy way to add
> proper support for OAuth/OIDC scope.
>
> On 25 September 2017 at 17:11, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is something for 4.0
>>
>> Was thinking that we should rename Client Templates to Client Scopes.
>> For oauth, oidc, and token exchange client asks for a specific scope
>> with the "scope" parameter. This "scope" parameter would be
the name
>> of a client-id or a client scope (formerly client emplates. Clients
>> will be granted access to scopes in the admin console. Probably
>> through authz services.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
--
Bill Burke
Red Hat