I'll look into it tonight after I get home from driving kid around.
On 4/13/2016 2:10 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
Ok, I've closed the
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614
Do you want me to look at merging modules or are you looking at it
Bill? I can sort it, but will be able to start on it no earlier than
tomorrow morning Europe time :/
Marek
On 13/04/16 20:03, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Rename or merge either works for me. We need it resolved asap though.
> Yes, we're going to have to re-test all adapters and examples because
> of this :(
>
> On 13 April 2016 at 18:18, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Wait! Maybe we should just merge adapter-spi and
> adapter-spi-public. Its not that big a deal to have adapter-spi
> be public.
>
>
> On 4/13/2016 12:10 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>> Found that fuse adapter doesn't work due to adapters packaging
>> changes. JIRA is here:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2816
>>
>> Among some minor things, the biggest issue is that osgi doesn't
>> work properly if there are 2 modules with classes inside same
>> package. There is "adapter-spi" and "adapter-spi-public"
modules
>> with both having classes inside package
>> "org.keycloak.adapters.spi". So the easiest solution was just to
>> rename the package.
>>
>> There was possibility to rename either:
>> (1) the one inside "adapter-spi"
>> (2) or the one inside "adapter-spi-public" .
>>
>> I've actually chose the (1) and renamed the one inside
>> "adapter-spi" to "org.keycloak.adapters.spi .internal".
Only
>> reason is that there might be some users, who are using classes
>> AuthenticationError or LogoutError, so they don't need to change
>> the code of their applications because upgrade. On the other
>> hand the (2) (rename the package inside "adapter-spi-public" to
>> "org.keycloak.adapters.spi.public" and keep the one inside
>> "adapter-spi" unrenamed) have the advantage of better
>> consistency among module names and package names. So if you
>> rather want me to go this way, let me know and I can change it.
>>
>> For now, the PR against 1.9.x for path1 is here:
>>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614 . There are 72
>> affected files because of package renamed, but all of them are
>> inside adapters. Will send PR against master too if you agree
>> with the path1. Not sure if we rather need to retest all the
>> examples because of the change... :-(
>>
>> Marek
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev