As part of Openshift integration, I needed to implement a Client Storage SPI. Here are my plans for it: * It is a private SPI * Only read only support. * Only lookup support to facilitate client login and grants and stuff. Listing all clients will not show up in admin conosle * There will be no admin console support. This means, no admin console support for provider config. Providers can only be configured through REST API or realm import. * Basically it will be bare bones to support Openshift integration only. My plan is that Openshift support will be distributed as an extension to our base image and/or, it will be a template realm.json import file that users can edit. I just don't want to expose an unfinished SPI. I'll probably have a PR for review early next week. -- Bill Burke Red Hat

All makes sense to me. Would probably make sense to also add a JIRA to include what would be needed to make it into a fully supported feature. FIY 3Scale was also interested in this as they currently have clients created through their UI and then have to create/manage clients through the admin endpoints in the background when users change client config in their UI. On 26 January 2018 at 20:02, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > A few more things: > > * Its implemented very similarly to UserStorage SPI. > * It will not support client roles > * It will not support node registration. > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > As part of Openshift integration, I needed to implement a Client > > Storage SPI. Here are my plans for it: > > > > * It is a private SPI > > * Only read only support. > > * Only lookup support to facilitate client login and grants and stuff. > > Listing all clients will not show up in admin conosle > > * There will be no admin console support. This means, no admin > > console support for provider config. Providers can only be configured > > through REST API or realm import. > > * Basically it will be bare bones to support Openshift integration only. > > > > My plan is that Openshift support will be distributed as an extension > > to our base image and/or, it will be a template realm.json import file > > that users can edit. I just don't want to expose an unfinished SPI. > > > > I'll probably have a PR for review early next week. > > > > -- > > Bill Burke > > Red Hat > > > > -- > Bill Burke > Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev