Hi Alessio,
as for discussion with Marek, we think the best way would be to omit the
new module and add the provider dependencies into the resteasy-client.
There is no need for new module as we can use one that is already in the
project.
Martin Stefanko
Associate Software Engineer
JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Martin Stefanko <mstefank(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
just wanted to bring this up again. For me it's alright to move these
dependencies into the resteasy-client.
Thank you.
Martin Stefanko
Associate Software Engineer
JBoss Sustaining Engineering Team
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I've followed up on
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1424 ,
> please check there.
>
> Cheers
> Alessio
>
>
> Il 20/06/2016 14:56, Marek Kopecky ha scritto:
>
> Hi all,
>
> in my point of view, resteasy-client should contains dependencies to
> important RESTEasy providers, because users just want to add
> "resteasy-client" dependency to their project and start to using it. But
> it is not possible now, they also need to add some providers (if they
> are not satisfied with text/plain media type). For example, users needs
> to use dependency to resteasy-jackson2-provider, if they have end-point
> in with "(a)Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)".
>
>
> What providers would you like to have as dependencies in
> resteasy-client? You can answer in
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1424
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marek
>
> _______________________________________________
> resteasy-dev mailing
listresteasy-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Alessio Soldano
> Web Service Lead, JBoss
>
>