I would also add that we are trying to be very careful about apiman's
feature set. There is a risk of overlapping with other projects to the
detriment of both. For example, service composition and request
transformations are areas we want to stay away from as much as possible.
There are better solutions out there for such problems.
But obviously features will be evaluated as needed. :)
-Eric
On 1/22/2015 9:56 AM, Jorge Morales Pou wrote:
Hi Bob,
This is usually solved at the application layer with a BUS doing this
API composition. Then APIMan would expose that API instead of the
multiple internal APIs. If apiman was combined with Fuse or camel, this
could be done, but I do not think that would be an easy feature.
Usually is best to place that logic into a BUS layer, and then expose
that service as well as an aggregated service, this way you could expose
all the single services and the aggregated one.
Cheers,
2015-01-22 13:06 GMT+01:00 Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann(a)redhat.com
<mailto:eric.wittmann@redhat.com>>:
Hi Bob, thanks for the question. I have CC'd the apiman mailing list in
case the answer is interesting to others.
Hopefully I understand the question, which is around aggregation of
various disparate APIs into a single application specific API. I think
that apiman does something similar to what you are suggesting, in that
all API endpoints end up going through the API Gateway rather than
directly to the various disparate services.
In other words, if a single application may consume N different services
provided through apiman, *all* of those services are ultimately consumed
through the root API Gateway endpoint (e.g.
http://gatewayhost.com/api-gateway/*).
That isn't quite the same as creating an application-specific API, but
is perhaps functionally equivalent.
At the moment we do not have any specific plans to implement API
aggregation in apiman, but if there were community interest in it then
we would certainly consider adding it to the roadmap. :)
-Eric
On 1/21/2015 1:44 PM, Bob McWhirter wrote:
> Heya Eric—
>
> So I’m looking into Microservices, and one thing that always pops
up is an "API Gateway” which might consume N services and expose
them as a single service.
>
> The use-case being that while a fat application (desktop, web,
etc) might talk to 15 different services, something on a constrained
network (such as Mobile) would rather have an application-specific
API that handles aggregating some subset of those 15 services into a
single service, reducing round-trips.
>
> Is this a use-case planned for by APIMan? Or would APIMan be
placed in front of an API Aggregator?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Bob McWhirter
>
_______________________________________________
Apiman-user mailing list
Apiman-user(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:Apiman-user@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-user