Yes, we should hide scopes and claims. Good catch.
On 9/12/2014 11:43 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
Possible related question is, if bearer-only applications need
scopes
and claims? Should we hide "Scopes" and "Claims" tabs in admin
console
when editing bearer-only application?
On 12.9.2014 14:51, Bill Burke wrote:
> Negative. Bearer-only applications can receive revocation policies.
> i.e. "don't accept tokens before this date". In the future we may
want
> to push things like allowed CORS origins, IP blacklists, user
> blacklists, etc. There's also stats we may want to gather from the
> applications.
>
> On 9/12/2014 5:25 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> I propose we remove the "Admin URL" field for bearer-only
>> applications. As a bearer-only application doesn't manage any user
>> sessions there's not much point in propagating logouts to those.
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com