Re: [keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype
On 11/21/2014 8:48 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 11/21/2014 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> As a side effect, we now have a pure Undertow adapter.
> I thought I already refactored our Undertow adapter to be pure?
>
I didn't see an adapter. Just abstract classes.
Ah, you are right. I got rid of the dependency on the Servlet API but I
never provided a concrete extension of UndertowKeycloakAuthMech.
I've actually got one on my local box. Should I add it to the Undertow
adapter?