). Ran that PR 5 times and it
passed every time, so hopefully it'll make it a bit more stable. Still
takes more than 1 hour to complete though.
On 16 August 2016 at 16:06, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
There are some alternatives that we could try:
*
https://www.cloudbees.com/partners/platform/red-hat
*
https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/continuous-
integration.html
* Make use of a beefy machine :)
* Or host Jenkins in some paid cloud infrastructure
If we don't have any volunteers, count me in.
On 2016-08-15, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> My opinion is that i HATE Travis! It's slow and has a tendency to act
like
> a stroppy toddler.
>
> Removing -q doesn't work because we then end up generating more log than
> Travis allows which kills the build as well.
>
> We used to have the caching enabled, but it used to result in a lot of
> issues. Can't quite remember the details though. Maybe we can try it
again.
>
> There's also travis_wait option that could work (
>
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#
Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
> ).
>
> My preference would be to migrate away from Travis and use something more
> beefy that can run tests quicker.
>
> I'll need to figure out someone to look into it though. Any volunteers?
>
>
>
>
> On 28 July 2016 at 17:11, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Let's see what Stian thinks about it :) For me, it is also an option.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
> > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>, "keycloak-dev"
<
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:45:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
> >
> > Another alternative, but you might not enjoy it, is :)
> >
> > Before start building Keycloak, pre-download all the '.m2' dir with
> > the dependencies required. Second alternative, is to try some
caching[1],
> > but it may
> > or may not work.
> >
> > [1] -
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/
> >
> > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> > > As Bruno suggested, the problem is probably related with the build
> > taking too long. If you look at the first command being executed:
> > >
> > > mvn install -Pdistribution -DskipTests=true -B -V -q
> > >
> > > The -q option tells maven to run in quite mode and only show errors.
> > Even in my laptop, if I run the command above it takes a bit more time
to
> > show any output (not too long, but more than usual). That may explain
that
> > message from Travis.
> > >
> > > Maybe we should remove -q and just log everything. That could make
the
> > builds more stable.
> > >
> > > I've forced a new build to your
https://github.com/keycloak/
> > keycloak/pull/3079 (without changing anything to .travis.yml). Now it
is
> > running.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>, "Bruno
Oliveira" <
> > bruno(a)abstractj.org>
> > > Cc: "keycloak-dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:53:16 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
> > >
> > > Wrong... :( I still get this problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/16 7:02 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> > > > I think Travis decided to not mess with Bill :)
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
> > > > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>,
"keycloak-dev" <
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:37:44 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
> > > >
> > > > Seems like the balance of the Force was established again.
> > > >
> > > > On 2016-07-27, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> > > >> Got that error, but now the build was successful.
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
> > > >> To: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> Cc: "keycloak-dev"
<keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:01:47 PM
> > > >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] travis seems to be down
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems like they are fully operational[1]. I believe that this is
the
> > > >> reason:
> > > >>
> > > >> "No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this
potentially
> > indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself."
> > > >>
> > > >> Based on my previous experiences, it happens when the build
takes
too
> > > >> long. Not really sure if that's the root cause, but I can
help
> > > >> investigating it.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] -
https://www.traviscistatus.com/
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2016-07-27, Bill Burke wrote:
> > > >>> A lot of builds failing in initial setup
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bill
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > >>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> abstractj
> > > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > abstractj
> > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914