> On Dec 4, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/4/2014 9:19 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
>> On 2014-12-04, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> I'd like to distribute this in the next release and document it. Will
>>> the appropriate Node.js distribution methods be available for this?
>>> (Bower?)
>>
>> Hi Bill, it's distributed under npm here
>>
https://www.npmjs.org/package/passport-keycloak
>>
>>> Change the version to 1.1.Beta2 :)
>>
>> I'm not so sure about the versioning, it's a big bump for the first
>> release. But I'm fine if you guys think the opposite.
>>
>
> Doesn't matter. Have it same version as Keycloak. It will be easier to
> keep track of compatibilities for both us and users. BTW, our Tomcat
> and Jetty are new, we didn't version it 0.0.alph1. :)
i sort of disagree here. This is just an adapter really, and should be on it’s own
versioning independent of what the main key cloak distribution is.
In my experience different versions just confuses people. It starts to
become important when you have multiple major versions out in the wild
and there are incompatibilities between them.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat