4:26 a.m.
I wonder if we should have a Keycloak extensions repository where we could
place things like this rather than adding directly to master.
On 31 March 2016 at 20:18, Thomas Raehalme <thomas.raehalme(a)aitiofinland.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Thomas Darimont <
> thomas.darimont(a)googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> would you mind sharing your keycloak configuration with a JMS
>> resource-adapter?
>>
>
> Here are the changes I made to standalone/configuration/standalone.xml:
>
> 1. Added the following extension under /server/extensions:
>
> <extension module="org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq"/>
>
> 2. Added the following subsystem under /server/profile:
>
> <subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:messaging-activemq:1.0">
> <server name="default">
> <security enabled="false" /> <!-- I didn't need to use
security as
> everything was localhost -->
> <remote-acceptor name="netty"
socket-binding="messaging"/>
> <remote-connector name="netty"
socket-binding="messaging"/>
> <in-vm-acceptor name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
> <in-vm-connector name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
> <pooled-connection-factory name="activemq-ra"
> transaction="xa" connectors="in-vm"
> entries="java:/ConnectionFactory java:/JmsXA
> java:jboss/DefaultJMSConnectionFactory"/>
> <jms-topic name="KeycloakEvents"
entries="jms/KeycloakEvents
> java:jboss/exported/jms/KeycloakEvents" />
> </server>
> </subsystem>
>
> 3. Added the following socket-binding under /server/socket-binding-group:
>
> <socket-binding name="messaging" port="61616"/>
>
> This enabled my external process to listen to the JMS topic.
>
> I attached a full example to this message. The changes have been marked
> with <!-- keycloak-events-jms -->.
>
> Did you manage to configure a new resource-adapter via jboss-cli?
>>
>
> No, I haven't used jboss-cli but modified the configuration file directly.
>
> My implementation of KEYCLOAK-2302 can be found at Github:
> https://github.com/raehalme/keycloak/tree/KEYCLOAK-2302.
>
> I have not sent a PR as I have yet to complete the Arquillian integration
> tests requested by Stian. Other work has kept me busy and I haven't had a
> chance to even rebase against 1.9.x.
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>