You still have to have different jars as how would Wildfly9Impl and
Wildfly10Impl compile? Again, the type parameters used in Wildfly9
don't exist in 10. The ones used in 10 don't exist in 9.
On 1/21/2016 2:19 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
What I mean is:
if
(TheProblemClass.class.getMethod("..").getParameterTypes()[0].equals(SomeObject.class))
{
return new WildFly9Impl();
} else {
return new WildFly10Impl();
}
Is that not simpler and easier for users than creating a whole new
adapter dist?
On 21 January 2016 at 20:11, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
<mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 1/21/2016 1:43 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>
> On 21 January 2016 at 18:31, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> I need to create a separate adapter distro for Wildfly 10 as
> it is not
> compatible with Wildfly 8 and 9. To do this, I need an
> explanation of
> the distribution directory for adapters
>
>
> Would it not be cleaner to incorporate something in the adapter
> that uses different classes depending on the undertow version?
No idea what you mean. The undertow class/method in question has
a different signature between 8-9 and 10. The method call has
parameters whose types don't exist in one or the other's versions.
Basically I'll be creating a wildfly10-adapter-spi and
wildfly9-adapter-spi jar that each have one class in them. These
modules are included in the adapter-spi module. I just don't see
any way around that.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com