Hi Pedro,
What failures are you experiencing? Is it the failure of test
historyOfAccessResourceTest
or is it something else? I remember this test was unstable, but I believe I
fixed it already as I haven't experienced any failures for a while.
In case it is something else, there is PR [1] for a small bug I introduced
during conflict merge, so maybe it will solve your issue.
Anyway, please send me some more details about this, I will investigate
whether it is a testsuite issue or something else.
Michal
[1]
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3960
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm experiencing some failures with tests in
org.keycloak.testsuite.adapter.example. For
instance, WildflyJSConsoleExampleAdapterTest. If i deploy js-console
example everything works fine.
Is this a known issue and I can safely ignore ? Even when running against
master (no elytron adapter changes) the test is failing.
If a known issue, which tests should I care most to make sure Elytron
Adapter is functional ?
Regards.
Pedro Igor
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm starting to finish up some tests with the new Elytron Adapters for
> OIDC and SAML. The idea is push the adapter as soon as I prepare
arquillian
> testsuite to run against a container using Elytron.
>
> Until now, I was using integration tests to test these adapters. But for
> now on, I'll be running all arquillian tests as suggested by Stian.
Results
> are pretty good so far, there is a single test failure right now
> (org.keycloak.testsuite.adapter.servlet.AbstractDemoServletsAdapterTes
t#historyOfAccessResourceTest)
> which I need to figure out what is going on.
>
> We are going to have a specific profile to test Elytron adapters. This
> profile is configured to run a WFLY 11 SNAPSHOT.
>
> I've already discussed this topic with Stian and the idea is to create a
> baseline for Elytron adapters as well start preparing Keycloak for
Wildfly
> 11 and the new security infrastructure provided by Elytron.
>
> This *does not* mean that we are replacing undertow adapters. But just
> preparing our adapters code base to the next WFLY release (and EAP 7).
>
> I'll probably send a PR on friday or early next week.
>
> Please, let me know if you have any questions about this work.
>
> Regards.
> Pedro Igor
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev