Re: [keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype

On 11/21/2014 8:48 AM, Bill Burke wrote: > > On 11/21/2014 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote: >>> As a side effect, we now have a pure Undertow adapter. >> I thought I already refactored our Undertow adapter to be pure? >> > I didn't see an adapter. Just abstract classes. > Ah, you are right. I got rid of the dependency on the Servlet API but I never provided a concrete extension of UndertowKeycloakAuthMech. I've actually got one on my local box. Should I add it to the Undertow adapter?