Probably shouldn't be exposing them. I can't think of any reason why we
should.
On 11/5/2014 9:07 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Doh! I get it now, the certificate is created from the realms
key-pair. Keycloak signs with private key, client checks with certificate.
BTW we're currently exposing the realm private key and the new code secret through
the admin rest endpoints. This isn't really a good thing is it?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 November, 2014 3:01:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Certificate on realm
>
> It is used by SAML. With SAML, there is an IDP XML descriptor and it
> publishes certificates, not public keys. IMO, we should probably start
> to move to certificates rather than public keys anyways. Also, if we
> ever add client cert support, I'd like client certs signed by this realm
> certificate.
>
> On 11/5/2014 8:37 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> What's the purpose of the x509 certificate on the RealmModel and in admin
>> console? I can't find any usage of it in the code.
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>