Do you want me to look at merging modules or are you looking at it Bill?
I can sort it, but will be able to start on it no earlier than tomorrow
morning Europe time :/
Marek
On 13/04/16 20:03, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Rename or merge either works for me. We need it resolved asap though.
Yes, we're going to have to re-test all adapters and examples because
of this :(
On 13 April 2016 at 18:18, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
<mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> wrote:
Wait! Maybe we should just merge adapter-spi and
adapter-spi-public. Its not that big a deal to have adapter-spi
be public.
On 4/13/2016 12:10 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
> Found that fuse adapter doesn't work due to adapters packaging
> changes. JIRA is here:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2816
>
> Among some minor things, the biggest issue is that osgi doesn't
> work properly if there are 2 modules with classes inside same
> package. There is "adapter-spi" and "adapter-spi-public"
modules
> with both having classes inside package
> "org.keycloak.adapters.spi". So the easiest solution was just to
> rename the package.
>
> There was possibility to rename either:
> (1) the one inside "adapter-spi"
> (2) or the one inside "adapter-spi-public" .
>
> I've actually chose the (1) and renamed the one inside
> "adapter-spi" to "org.keycloak.adapters.spi .internal". Only
> reason is that there might be some users, who are using classes
> AuthenticationError or LogoutError, so they don't need to change
> the code of their applications because upgrade. On the other hand
> the (2) (rename the package inside "adapter-spi-public" to
> "org.keycloak.adapters.spi.public" and keep the one inside
> "adapter-spi" unrenamed) have the advantage of better consistency
> among module names and package names. So if you rather want me to
> go this way, let me know and I can change it.
>
> For now, the PR against 1.9.x for path1 is here:
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614 . There are 72
> affected files because of package renamed, but all of them are
> inside adapters. Will send PR against master too if you agree
> with the path1. Not sure if we rather need to retest all the
> examples because of the change... :-(
>
> Marek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev