Re: [keycloak-dev] Doc renaming and organization suggestion
-1 I see a clear distinction between someone that wants to secure
applications/services with Keycloak and someone that wants to extend the
Keycloak server. Even when it's the same person they are very different
tasks.
On 2 October 2017 at 16:37, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I suggest we rename Server Developer Guide to Keycloak (RH-SSO)
Developer Guide. We move all programmer related SPIs, REST interface
docs (token exchange), Client Registration, adapter SPIs, really
anything a developer would do to this guide.
Securing Apps should be specifically configuration tasks for securing
an application. Only things an admin would do and no developer
concerns should be there.
--
Bill Burke
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev