The reason we had it like this is so you can deploy the server WAR to a plain WildFly
without adding the datasource.
I'm all for changing it, at least personally I very rarely deploy it this way and can
easily create the datasource when I do.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 14 August, 2014 10:32:27 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] keycloak-server.json
It should refer to KeycloakDS. It is not a good practice to use
ExampleDS as this is something the user will want to change probably.
On 8/14/2014 1:29 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> In the keycloak-server module, the keycloak-server.json file refers to
> the ExampleDS datasource[1] instead of KeycloakDS, which is used
> everywhere in the distribution. If we change this in the main build
> then we won't need to use the replacer[2] plugin in the dist.
>
> But before I push the change I'm wondering if there was a reason it was
> done that way? Nothing seems to break in the tests when I change it.
>
> Should I go ahead push the change?
>
> Stan
>
> [1]
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/server/src/main/resource...
> [2]
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/distribution/war-zip/pom...
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev