Re: [keycloak-dev] infinispan as a storage mechanism

Isn't this somewhat related with what we used to have with MongoDB ? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > If we had a built-in, clusterable storage mechanism for Keycloak using > Infinispan we would: > * Shorten build times drastically. 30 minutes and growing for me for > JPA builds. Liquibase + JPA startup takes 5-7 seconds on my box. > * Simpler startup. No need to start a DB. > * Reduce memory footprint? I think JPA is responsible for a lot of > classes loaded. > > I've started some work on this in spare time. I'd say I'd be done in > like 2 months considering the other work I have in queue. > > Looking at FineGrainAtomicMap as an implementation. Should make DB > migration simple and replication quicker. > > > -- > Bill Burke > Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev