+1
Keeping docs doesn't mean it's supported. JDK and Spring framework docs are
still hosted even if not supported anymore. It's a useful reference even
once past eol.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
-1 IMO we shouldn't support old versions - docs are available to
download
through SourceForge
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 July, 2015 3:09:25 PM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] Docs for older versions
>
> It looks the docs
>
http://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/html/index.html covers just
> latest version. Shouldn't we add the version to the URL and keep the
> docs for older versions as well? I mean something like:
>
http://keycloak.github.io/docs/1.3.1.Final/userguide/html/index.html .
>
> The problem is that many people are still on older Keycloak version and
> if they look into latest docs, there are some informations which are not
> valid for the older versions (For example see keycloak-user mailing
> thread from today with subject "Dump user profile data from Social
> Identity Provider" )
>
> Marek
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev