6:14 a.m.
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
* Identity brokering
* Kerberos federation
What's the ETA on those?
6:35 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:14:38 AM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
* Identity brokering
The identity broker is pretty much done. However, to deliver something really useful we
need at least role mapping. Which I'm not sure is being considered in the "Custom
claims" or not.
Right now I'm writing the documentation. I've already added some useful examples
and going to add one more for OIDC brokering.
* Kerberos federation
What's the ETA on those?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
6:40 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:35:31 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:14:38 AM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
>
> For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
>
> * Custom claims
> * Identity brokering
The identity broker is pretty much done. However, to deliver something really
useful we need at least role mapping. Which I'm not sure is being considered
in the "Custom claims" or not.
Would be great to have role mapping in Beta1, although it would be nice to release
something soon (1-2 weeks from now) so it could be done for Beta2 as well.
Right now I'm writing the documentation. I've already added some useful
examples and going to add one more for OIDC brokering.
How about once 1.2.0.Beta1 is released you write a blog with how to use Keycloak to login
with Google and invoke some Google API after obtaining the token from KC?
> * Kerberos federation
>
> What's the ETA on those?
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
6:52 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:40:38 AM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:35:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:14:38 AM
> > Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
> >
> > For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
> >
> > * Custom claims
> > * Identity brokering
>
> The identity broker is pretty much done. However, to deliver something
> really
> useful we need at least role mapping. Which I'm not sure is being
> considered
> in the "Custom claims" or not.
Would be great to have role mapping in Beta1, although it would be nice to
release something soon (1-2 weeks from now) so it could be done for Beta2 as
well.
For social we are cool. Problem is enterprise use cases (like the one we had recently in
the mailing list) that usually demands such thing. But I agree, better is to deliver
something ASAP.
>
> Right now I'm writing the documentation. I've already added some useful
> examples and going to add one more for OIDC brokering.
How about once 1.2.0.Beta1 is released you write a blog with how to use
Keycloak to login with Google and invoke some Google API after obtaining the
token from KC?
Sure. Beside that, we have now examples to demonstrate all that using twitter, google and
facebook.
>
> > * Kerberos federation
> >
> > What's the ETA on those?
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
>
6:55 a.m.
Btw, I think we should have a meeting 1 or 2 weeks before the release in order to sync
important features being delivered. So we can demonstrate these features, collect feedback
and fill gaps that may pass unnoticed during development.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:14:38 AM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
* Identity brokering
* Kerberos federation
What's the ETA on those?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
7:41 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:55:04 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
Btw, I think we should have a meeting 1 or 2 weeks before the release in
order to sync important features being delivered. So we can demonstrate
these features, collect feedback and fill gaps that may pass unnoticed
during development.
Demonstrating features is a great idea. We should do it when it's ready though and not
everything at once 1-2 weeks before release.
End of Thursdays meetings are great for that!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
To: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:14:38 AM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.0.Beta1 release
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
* Identity brokering
* Kerberos federation
What's the ETA on those?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
12:57 p.m.
For Kerberos, the remaining needed stuff is:
- Automated tests (looks ApacheDS can be used for that. We are already
using it for LDAP test)
- More interoperability testing (want to look at FreeIPA at least)
- Docs
This is "must have" for Beta1 and should be next week.
I will need to take a look at credentials delegation, which can be
likely postponed to Beta2 if I can't finish it next week.
Marek
On 19.2.2015 13:14, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
* Identity brokering
* Kerberos federation
What's the ETA on those?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
1:49 p.m.
On 2/19/2015 7:14 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
* Custom claims
Still awhile aways. Keep get interrupted by emails, phone, kids (they
have winter vacation), meetings, etc...
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
2:19 a.m.
I see what you mean. Tomorrow I had two 2,5 hours meetings and some
other errands, so it was kind of "no real work" day for me ;-)
The second one was with jboss.org team. Good thing is that they're happy
with Keycloak and would prefer it instead of cas. Few things will be
needed to add/fix in Keycloak, but looks there is no major missing
feature, which they need and we don't have.
Marek
On 19.2.2015 20:49, Bill Burke wrote:
On 2/19/2015 7:14 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
>
> * Custom claims
Still awhile aways. Keep get interrupted by emails, phone, kids (they
have winter vacation), meetings, etc...
2:20 a.m.
Oops, I meant "yesterday" :-)
On 20.2.2015 09:19, Marek Posolda wrote:
I see what you mean. Tomorrow I had two 2,5 hours meetings and some
other errands, so it was kind of "no real work" day for me ;-)
The second one was with jboss.org team. Good thing is that they're happy
with Keycloak and would prefer it instead of cas. Few things will be
needed to add/fix in Keycloak, but looks there is no major missing
feature, which they need and we don't have.
Marek
On 19.2.2015 20:49, Bill Burke wrote:
> On 2/19/2015 7:14 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> For 1.2.0.Beta1 we should at least include:
>>
>> * Custom claims
> Still awhile aways. Keep get interrupted by emails, phone, kids (they
> have winter vacation), meetings, etc...
>
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
3547
days inactive
3548
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bill Burke -
Marek Posolda -
Pedro Igor Silva -
Stian Thorgersen