2:50 p.m.
Is there a reason we lazily init the JDBC connector? Was that because
the code existed before ProviderFactory.postInit()?
3:02 p.m.
Nevermind :)
On 9/6/16 3:50 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Is there a reason we lazily init the JDBC connector? Was that
because
the code existed before ProviderFactory.postInit()?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
7:23 a.m.
It takes 40 seconds and isn't needed with Mongo. It's not the nicest code
and I was considering adding an init method that is called first time the
provider is requested, but never got around to it.
On 6 September 2016 at 22:02, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Nevermind :)
On 9/6/16 3:50 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> Is there a reason we lazily init the JDBC connector? Was that because
> the code existed before ProviderFactory.postInit()?
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
3032
days inactive
3033
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bill Burke -
Stian Thorgersen