Yep, I know. It sucks! The aim is to improve on it if we can, but we have some issue on
feature-packs and also there's some differences.
With regards to server bits, there's two places:
* feature-packs/server-feature-pack
* server-overlay/eap6/eap6-server-modules
The problem is that the way modules are defined in feature-packs are different. I
don't think we can build modules for EAP6 from the WF9 feature-pack. It's probably
not worth the effort finding out either as EAP6 support is only temporary.
With regards to adapters there's even more places, but much less modules:
* as7-eap6-adapter/as7-modules
* wf8-adapter/wf8-modules
* wf9-adapter/wf9-modules
adapter-feature-pack isn't actually used by adapter dists yet as we don't yet know
how to build a "add-on" zip from feature packs. Once we figure that out
"wf9-adapter/wf9-modules" will go. There's a few difference between the
modules built for each adapter, so not sure it makes sense to have the same for all or
not.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, 15 June, 2015 10:08:26 PM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] 2 places to edit modules now?
Module definition is now done in 3 places? Copies of one another?
eap6-service-overlay
server-feature-pack
adapter-feature-pack
This is very very error prone guys. I guarantee somebody will forget to
update something.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev