How to remove expired user sessions?
by Petr Mensik
Hello guys,
I came across this while I was rewriting integration tests to Arquillian. There is a code which calls KeycloakSession#sessions().removeExpiredUserSessions(realm) (in AdapterTestStragetegy), is there any equivalent of this in the UI of admin console or a call through REST API (via org.keycloak.admin.client.Keycloak) ? Because I haven't been able to find neither of these options. Thanks a lot for help.
Petr Mensik | IRC: pmensik
Quality Engineer | Quality Engineering
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
11 years, 1 month
Re: [keycloak-dev] [wildfly-dev] 2 places to edit modules now?
by Stan Silvert
On 6/16/2015 8:36 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> A feature-pack can extend another feature pack,
> I am sure you guys know that.
>
> so you could have "keycloak-base" feature pack that all other 3 extend.
>
> the base would than have all common modules defined.
> and other 3 extra specializations.
That's an OK approach if there is a well-defined base of modules that
several projects use. But that's really not the case.
In any feature pack I should be able to just list the artifacts I'm
using and it provides a default module.xml file for that.
>
> --
> tomaz
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:ssilvert@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Cross-posting to wildfly-dev.
>
> It sounds like we need a way to standardize module.xml definitions
> across projects and have them accessible from maven GAV's. These
> module.xml files are rarely different between projects and it doesn't
> make sense for each feature pack to define its own copy.
>
> On 6/15/2015 4:08 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> > Module definition is now done in 3 places? Copies of one another?
> >
> > eap6-service-overlay
> > server-feature-pack
> > adapter-feature-pack
> >
> > This is very very error prone guys. I guarantee somebody will
> forget to
> > update something.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
11 years, 1 month
2 places to edit modules now?
by Bill Burke
Module definition is now done in 3 places? Copies of one another?
eap6-service-overlay
server-feature-pack
adapter-feature-pack
This is very very error prone guys. I guarantee somebody will forget to
update something.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
11 years, 1 month
bring back ability to disable direct grant
by Bill Burke
I was thinking about recaptcha support. The purpose of recaptcha is to
make sure a bot is not trying to log into system. Really good for
something like registration, but also very useful for regular logins for
extra security. Recaptcha would elleviate the need for Brute Force
Protector.
This thing is though, if you still have direct grant, then putting in
recaptcha at login is pointless as an attacker can just go through
direct grant.
Can we bring back the ability to disable direct grant?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
11 years, 1 month
auth spi merged
by Bill Burke
Big changes on how we do authentication. I still need to use this new
model for direct grant. There's still a bit of worked to do around
Events and ClientSessionCode.
I'd like to do a presentation on it Thursday.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
11 years, 1 month
Re: [keycloak-dev] verify email is skipped if no email
by Vlastimil Elias
This is covered by https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-1371 which
allows to configure Identity provider to Show "update profile" page on
first login only when some mandatory field is missing. For now user
profile mandatory fields are hardcoded (email, first and last name). It
should be cool to allow configuration of which user profile fields are
mandatory.
Vl.
On 10.6.2015 19:13, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 10 June, 2015 4:48:17 PM
>> Subject: [keycloak-dev] verify email is skipped if no email
>>
>> The verify email required action is skipped if the user has no email.
>> Is this the right behavior? Should the user instead be required to
>> enter in an email address that can be verified?
> +1 It doesn't really make sense to require users to verify their email, but at the same time not require users to enter one
>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Vlastimil Elias
Principal Software Engineer
jboss.org Development Team
11 years, 1 month
Start committing for 1.4
by Stian Thorgersen
I've created a branch for 1.3, which will be released early next week.
So go ahead and commit stuff for 1.4 :)
11 years, 1 month
