Its spec compliance, a quick fix, and makes things simpler.
Sorry for the delay in responding, I was out on PTO.
Thank you for making the change.
Spec compliance should always be a priority.
On 4/18/2016 9:26 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> We're way past feature freeze and need to carefully consider including
> more changes for 1.9.x.
>
> Unless this is required, which from my understanding it's not, we
> create a JIRA issue for 2.x and post-pone.
>
> On 18 April 2016 at 15:03, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:psilva@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com
<mailto:bburke@redhat.com>>
> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com
<mailto:psilva@redhat.com>>
> Cc: "John Dennis"
<<mailto:jdennis@redhat.com>jdennis@redhat.com>,
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>, "Nathan Kinder"
> <nkinder(a)redhat.com <mailto:nkinder@redhat.com>>
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:47:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak's SAML AuthnResponse uses
> wrong binding
>
>
>
> On 4/18/2016 7:23 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> >> IMO, what the bug fixes should be are:
> >> * Make sure "Force POST Binding" is on by default (High
Priority)
> > As John pointed out ...
> >
> > Don't you think that in 2.0 you can just do POST and remove that
> "Force POST Binding" switch ?
>
> I would just do it now. It is a easy fix and makes configuration that
> much simpler. If you agree I'll just change it.
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev