that probably makes sense to merge, as long as the utils api is still
available after the merge
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Sebastien Blanc <sblanc(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I know at least one project (a mbass solution) that is planning to
replace some "manual" code by using the keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils module.
It's in an integration layer and it only needs to handle token/grant
retrieval and refresh.
But I don't think it would be a real problem if this module is merged
with connect.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Today the only use case scenario for
> keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils is the usage with keycloak-nodejs-connect for
> authorization. Besides that I don't see any reason to have it as a
> separate module. Unless we have plans for new modules like Passport
> strategies, or embed the authorization bits in some framework
> non-related with Connect.
>
> What do you guys think about merge auth-utils codebase into
> keycloak-nodejs-connect?
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev