On 5 April 2016 at 14:36, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 4/5/2016 8:32 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
On 5 April 2016 at 14:19, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/5/2016 7:47 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>
>
> 2) Use JAX-RS 2 client
>>
>> +1
>>
>> But it will be good if people have possibility to configure the details
>> of underlying Apache HTTP Client (connection pooling, connection/socket
>> timeouts, tls etc). If it's possible to achieve it and use JAX-RS 2 client
>> at the same time, it will be cool. Otherwise if we need to choose just one
>> of these, the "configurability" of Apache HTTP client is more important
IMO.
>>
>
> Sticking with RestEasy Client makes the assumption that all users use
> other JBoss projects. We know that's not true as Tomcat, Jetty and Spring
> adapters all have a lot of use. IMO we should either convert to JAX-RS 2
> client or use Apache HTTP client directly (I'm not to keen on that though).
>
> At least we may just have possibility to inject underlying javax.ws.rs.client.Client
> during creation of admin-client. So if someone is on resteasy and wants to
> tweak Apache HTTP Client, he can use RestEasy API to build client by
> himself and inject it. If he's using some other library, he would need to
> use it's API to build client (and possibly configure connection pooling etc
> in library specific way).
>
> If you're using Tomcat, Spring or whatever, anything JBoss is evil and
> they can't co-exist? That's ridiculous. You're really going to stub
out
> every single piece of the REST api and/or write your own tool? No....
>
We're already stubbing out everything due to having to create the
interfaces. I've never been convinced about exposing RestEasy client
interfaces/proxies directly as the usability is not very good IMO.
Especially around error handling.
What's wrong with JAX-RS 2.0?
The proxy thing is Resteasy specific. Its not in the spec.
What's this then
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/index.html?javax/ws/rs/client/ClientB...
?
> We revise the rest interface. Either use Resteasy, or they can write
> their own clients.
>
What are you saying here exactly?
That we use Resteasy to create the admin client. If somebody doesn't want
to have a dependency on Resteasy then they are on their own.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red
Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com