Thanks
On 24 May 2016 at 11:44, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
+1 Jira created:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3030
On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> It's a bit confusing, but Keycloak server is still technically a war
under
> the covers, that's why setting it like that works. I wonder if we could
> just rename the war to drop the war extension and then it would just be
> "keycloak-server" and we could remove all the talk about war and name
> changes.
>
> On 24 May 2016 at 10:53, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > Because today we no longer distribute/deploy war files to get Keycloak
up
> > and
> > running, but I can be wrong and totally missing the point here. Also, I
> > couldn't
> > find any reference at the docs to deploy that WAR, or generate it with
> > -Pdistribution.
> >
> >
> > On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > > We're completely redoing the docs at the moment.
> > >
> > > Why do you say that section is not valid, at a quick glance it looks
ok
> > to
> > > me.
> > >
> > > On 23 May 2016 at 22:10, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ahoy, I was looking at 3.4 section from our docs (
> > > >
> >
https://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/keycloak-server/html/server-ins...
> > ).
> > > > I believe this section is no longer valid, right?
> > > >
> > > > If yes, I'm planning to remove it or should we replace with some
> > > > alternative?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > abstractj
> > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> >
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914