Again, create extra work for yourself if you want to...But if LiveOak is
using Netty or Undertow, no reason JAX-RS can't be plugged in. Its
funny how Vert.x can place so much importance on polyglot, yet can't
support a simple REST framework.
On 12/18/2013 12:41 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Resteasy/JAX-RS on LiveOak makes as much sense as margarine on
butter. LiveOak is a container for REST resources and doesn't provide direct access to
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, 16 December, 2013 2:09:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak server environments
> On 12/16/2013 8:52 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> Do what you want, but I think its silly to not just adapt LiveOak to use
>> Resteasy/JAX-RS. If LiveOak supports BIO/Streams, it would be easy to
>> adapt Resteasy to run in that environment. Its already been done for
>> Netty 3 and 4, JDK HTTP, and even Grizzly.
> That being said, the code does need refactoring to get the bits that
> aren't JAX-RS specific into a Java API that could be used.
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> keycloak-dev mailing list
JBoss, a division of Red Hat