I’ve been doing some work around the admin client and endpoints. I noticed that
org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.UsersResource does not implement the
org.keycloak.admin.client.resource.UsersResource interface. Is there an intentional reason
for this?
It would be easier to keep the server implementation honest to the APIs if the interfaces
were implemented plus simplify implementation discovery. Seems there are redundant POJOs
as a result of this too.
What do you guys think about modifying the admin service to implement the client
interfaces?
Thanks,
Scott
Scott Rossillo
Smartling | Senior Software Engineer
srossillo(a)smartling.com
Show replies by date