I was hoping to start a conversation on what's the best path forward to get maintainable support for active/active db's that have schema restrictions that are not upheld historically by Keycloak's schema and Liquibase based setup. How best can we make often minor schema adjustments in a maintainable fashion going forward? Perhaps a method to choose on install/upgrade between fully backwards compatible migrations vs the migration style that supports active/active? The Keycloak docs mention Oracle RAC and MySQL Galera for example https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_installation/index.html#database and I saw a PR for Postgres-BDR that was rejected due to understandable migration concerns for existing installs: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-5769 For Reference: MariaDB Galera limitations <https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/mariadb-galera-cluster-known-limitation... Postres-BDR limitations <http://bdr-project.org/docs/1.0.3/ddl-replication-statements.html> Thanks! Alec