Wasn't sure we had, but let's go with that. Thanks
On 17 October 2016 at 17:31, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I thought we already agreed we'd make KeycloakDS non-xa?
On 10/17/16 1:20 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Bill - can you comment on this please?
On 13 October 2016 at 15:44, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> IMO we should not make KeycloakDS XA by default. Rather, the docs for the
> user federation provider should state that if you add another datasource
> you need to make that one XA.