Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good shape to release M1 this week. One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..' instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort this out tomorrow. _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

I agree what you're proposing is better - I'll do it that way.. What's your thoughts on M1? Can we release to Maven on Friday? Nice vid's btw :) ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:45:26 PM > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress > > Being able to change an ID is not a good idea. DB constraints et. al. > -1. > > Let's keep realm Name and ID in the data model, but just set the ID to > be the name on creating. But only for realms, not anything else please. > It should be possible to have same app names in different realms. > > > On 12/4/2013 1:15 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: >> Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good shape >> to release M1 this week. >> >> One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated >> id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..' >> instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by >> letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the >> id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort this >> out tomorrow. >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-dev mailing list >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >> > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >

Ok - if you find crap just let me know, I'm fairly good with a shovel ;) I'd like it in Nexus on Friday though, it doesn't have to be M1, a timestamp would do. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:54:48 PM > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress > > I don't know. There still may be a lot of issues around the distro that > need to be fixed. I often discover how crappy things are when I > document things. > > On 12/4/2013 2:52 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: >> I agree what you're proposing is better - I'll do it that way.. >> >> What's your thoughts on M1? Can we release to Maven on Friday? >> >> Nice vid's btw :) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:45:26 PM >>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress >>> >>> Being able to change an ID is not a good idea. DB constraints et. al. >>> -1. >>> >>> Let's keep realm Name and ID in the data model, but just set the ID to >>> be the name on creating. But only for realms, not anything else please. >>> It should be possible to have same app names in different realms. >>> >>> >>> On 12/4/2013 1:15 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: >>>> Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good >>>> shape >>>> to release M1 this week. >>>> >>>> One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated >>>> id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..' >>>> instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by >>>> letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the >>>> id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort >>>> this >>>> out tomorrow. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> keycloak-dev mailing list >>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bill Burke >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>> http://bill.burkecentral.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> keycloak-dev mailing list >>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >>> > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev