I don't know. There still may be a lot of issues around the distro that
need to be fixed. I often discover how crappy things are when I
document things.
On 12/4/2013 2:52 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
I agree what you're proposing is better - I'll do it that
way..
What's your thoughts on M1? Can we release to Maven on Friday?
Nice vid's btw :)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:45:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress
>
> Being able to change an ID is not a good idea. DB constraints et. al.
> -1.
>
> Let's keep realm Name and ID in the data model, but just set the ID to
> be the name on creating. But only for realms, not anything else please.
> It should be possible to have same app names in different realms.
>
>
> On 12/4/2013 1:15 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good shape
>> to release M1 this week.
>>
>> One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated
>> id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..'
>> instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by
>> letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the
>> id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort
this
>> out tomorrow.
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>