For 1.2.0.Final the server should be deployable to: * WildFly 8.2.0.Final * EAP 6.4.0.GA After 1.2.0.Final we should move on to WildFly 9.0.0.Final (once it's released). As APIs has changed, and there's also new features in WF 9 we can leverage, the cleanest way to do this is to drop support for deploying to EAP 6.4.0.GA. With regards to adapters what versions should we support: * AS7 - can we drop this? * WildFly - only last (9.0.0.Final) or two last (8.2.0.Final and 9.0.0.Final)? * EAP - only last (6.4), two last (6.3, 6.4) or three last (6.2, 6.3, 6.4)?

_______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:00:46 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Supported environments On 4/28/2015 3:33 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote: > > > W dniu 2015-04-27 o 08:37, Stian Thorgersen pisze: >> For 1.2.0.Final the server should be deployable to: >> >> * WildFly 8.2.0.Final >> * EAP 6.4.0.GA >> >> After 1.2.0.Final we should move on to WildFly 9.0.0.Final (once it's >> released). As APIs has changed, and there's also new features in WF 9 we >> can leverage, the cleanest way to do this is to drop support for >> deploying to EAP 6.4.0.GA. >> >> With regards to adapters what versions should we support: >> >> * AS7 - can we drop this? >> * WildFly - only last (9.0.0.Final) or two last (8.2.0.Final and >> 9.0.0.Final)? >> * EAP - only last (6.4), two last (6.3, 6.4) or three last (6.2, 6.3, >> 6.4)? > > Would go with only latest stable WF and only last minor of EAP 6. > We should never drop adapter support for any platform. The larger our adapter pool, the larger our user base will be.

-- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com _______________________________________________ keycloak-dev mailing list keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:00:46 PM > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Supported environments > > > > On 4/28/2015 3:33 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote: >> >> >> W dniu 2015-04-27 o 08:37, Stian Thorgersen pisze: >>> For 1.2.0.Final the server should be deployable to: >>> >>> * WildFly 8.2.0.Final >>> * EAP 6.4.0.GA >>> >>> After 1.2.0.Final we should move on to WildFly 9.0.0.Final (once it's >>> released). As APIs has changed, and there's also new features in WF 9 we >>> can leverage, the cleanest way to do this is to drop support for >>> deploying to EAP 6.4.0.GA. >>> >>> With regards to adapters what versions should we support: >>> >>> * AS7 - can we drop this? >>> * WildFly - only last (9.0.0.Final) or two last (8.2.0.Final and >>> 9.0.0.Final)? >>> * EAP - only last (6.4), two last (6.3, 6.4) or three last (6.2, 6.3, >>> 6.4)? >> >> Would go with only latest stable WF and only last minor of EAP 6. >> > > We should never drop adapter support for any platform. The larger our > adapter pool, the larger our user base will be. So we're maintaining AS7 support for ever?!?

From: "Boleslaw Dawidowicz" <bdawidow(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt;, keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:16:35 AM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Supported environments > On 28 Apr 2015, at 17:14, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On 4/28/2015 10:02 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:00:46 PM >>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Supported environments >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/28/2015 3:33 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-04-27 o 08:37, Stian Thorgersen pisze: >>>>> For 1.2.0.Final the server should be deployable to: >>>>> >>>>> * WildFly 8.2.0.Final >>>>> * EAP 6.4.0.GA >>>>> >>>>> After 1.2.0.Final we should move on to WildFly 9.0.0.Final (once it's >>>>> released). As APIs has changed, and there's also new features in WF 9 >>>>> we >>>>> can leverage, the cleanest way to do this is to drop support for >>>>> deploying to EAP 6.4.0.GA. >>>>> >>>>> With regards to adapters what versions should we support: >>>>> >>>>> * AS7 - can we drop this? >>>>> * WildFly - only last (9.0.0.Final) or two last (8.2.0.Final and >>>>> 9.0.0.Final)? >>>>> * EAP - only last (6.4), two last (6.3, 6.4) or three last (6.2, 6.3, >>>>> 6.4)? >>>> >>>> Would go with only latest stable WF and only last minor of EAP 6. >>>> >>> >>> We should never drop adapter support for any platform. The larger our >>> adapter pool, the larger our user base will be. >> >> So we're maintaining AS7 support for ever?!? >> > > I don't think it will be much of an issue. These old platforms are > pretty static and the adapters are generic enough to evolve. > IMO it is all about maintenance cost of covering many versions of same container. If it is low enough then it shouldn’t be a problem - especially for adapters.

> > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev