2:49 p.m.
Hi,
I'm building my own keycloak container with theme etc. built in (because to
run in AWS ECS attaching volumes with the theme is not really possible and
I will need some other code mods later).
I notice the source OS has recently changed from a jboss image to RHEL's
ubi8-minimal.
Which is fine, except that it pulls the image from a repo that requires
authentication, which is a bit annoying.
Not only do you need auth, but your account needs a "subscription".
Anyone got an idea of the rationale behind using the "
registry.redhat.io/ubi8-minimal" instead of "
registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8-minimal" which doesn't need any
authentication?
It seems like an extra speed bump in the way for absolutely no reason to me!
1:05 p.m.
Still on the topic of the new ubi8-minimal image in github's master repo
for the docker image. It doesn't create/define the jboss user.
So processes run as a user (ID 1000) not mentioned in /etc/passwd.
And, if you try to "exec" your way into the image, you have no home
directory so can't use the kcadm.sh command for example.
Is this the best place to raise these issues before creating them as bugs
or should I be on the "dev" list?
1:15 p.m.
Here should be good enough Max. Could you please create a bug adding
the steps to reproduce?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:05 PM Max Allan
<max.allan+keycloak(a)surevine.com> wrote:
Still on the topic of the new ubi8-minimal image in github's master repo
for the docker image. It doesn't create/define the jboss user.
So processes run as a user (ID 1000) not mentioned in /etc/passwd.
And, if you try to "exec" your way into the image, you have no home
directory so can't use the kcadm.sh command for example.
Is this the best place to raise these issues before creating them as bugs
or should I be on the "dev" list?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
- abstractj
7:46 a.m.
FYI a Jira was created to follow up on this:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-11636
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:15 PM Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Here should be good enough Max. Could you please create a bug adding
the steps to reproduce?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:05 PM Max Allan
<max.allan+keycloak(a)surevine.com> wrote:
>
> Still on the topic of the new ubi8-minimal image in github's master repo
> for the docker image. It doesn't create/define the jboss user.
> So processes run as a user (ID 1000) not mentioned in /etc/passwd.
> And, if you try to "exec" your way into the image, you have no home
> directory so can't use the kcadm.sh command for example.
>
> Is this the best place to raise these issues before creating them as bugs
> or should I be on the "dev" list?
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
- abstractj
--
- abstractj
1690
days inactive
1696
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Max Allan