There should be
On 08/02/17 10:41, Salvatore Incandela wrote:
This is what is see from log files:
/2017-02-08 10:36:41,667 TRACE
[org.keycloak.federation.ldap.idm.store.ldap.LDAPIdentityStore]
(default task-44) Found ldap object and populated with the attributes.
LDAP Object: LDAP Object [ dn: uid=example,ou=People,dc=example,dc=it
, uuid: example, attributes: {uid=[example],
userPassword=[[B@6ba1b2f0], mail=[example(a)example.it
<mailto:example@example.it>], givenName=[example], sn=[example],
title=[disabled], modifyTimestamp=[20170207194557Z],
createTimestamp=[20170207114007Z]}, readOnly attribute names:
[givenname, sn, userpassword, mail, uid, modifytimestamp, title,
createtimestamp] ]/
Any other TRACE message like:Using filter for LDAP search
.....
?
Why in the case of UUID search the Custom User LDAP Filter is ignored?
Yes, it is
used just at the point when you're searching LDAP for example
by username, email etc. When you search by UUID, you lookup for the
concrete LDAP object by id, which you already retrieved before. You can
try to search for example from admin console to see the filters applied.
Marek
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mposolda@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 07/02/17 16:12, Salvatore Incandela wrote:
Hi Guys, I'm configuring keycloak 7.0 with Ldap Federation, I
put a custom
query in the *Custom User LDAP Filter* parameter
("(title=enabled)"), but
this seems to be ignored.
Looking on the LDAPIdentityStore.fetchQueryResults method. It
seems that
once an EqualsCondition was found this one is considered and
the others
ignored.
*if (condition instanceof EqualCondition) {*
.
.
return results;
}
Nope, if you look at the code more deeply, you can find that this
one is used just for the special case when you query by UUID.
Maybe it can help to enable TRACE logging for the class
org.keycloak.storage.ldap.idm.store.ldap.LDAPIdentityStore in your
standalone.xml . With this enabled, you should be able to see some
additional logging messages in server.log like:
TRACE Using filter for LDAP search: ...
you can see in which DN you're searching and how exactly your LDAP
filter looks like. Hopefully this can help to figure what is wrong.
Marek
I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong, some ideas?
--
Salvatore Incandela
Middleware Consultant
------------------------------
Red Hat -
www.redhat.com <
http://www.redhat.com/>
Via Andrea Doria 41M
00192 Roma (Italy)
Mobile +39 349 6196615
Fax +39 06 39728535
E-mail salvatore.incandela(a)redhat.com
<mailto:salvatore.incandela@redhat.com>