Resteasy is using org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServlet30Dispatcher in
processing @Suspended.
We use it in test cases here,
./testsuite/integration-tests/src/test/resources/org/jboss/resteasy/test/asynch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Schlansker"
<sschlansker(a)opentable.com>
To: resteasy-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 7:16:29 PM
Subject: Re: [resteasy-dev] RESTEasy asynchronous processing with @Suspended -- actually
synchronous?
Hi again,
I was somewhat disappointed to not get an answer here, but I did a fair
amount more digging,
and managed to find Filter30Dispatcher (which just moved recently for
upcoming 3.1.0)
Unfortunately then I found that the documentation does not mention this
class at all, but at least it exists!
(at least not on
http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0.19.Final/userguide/html_single/in...
)
So far it seems to work well. Better than FilterDispatcher, at least :)
Let me know if there's any gotchas or other bits that I've missed.
Best,
Steven
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Steven Schlansker <sschlansker(a)opentable.com>
> wrote:
>
> [ apologies for the rampant cross-posting, it looks like I might have been
> sending this to old mailing lists, and getting lost in the void? ]
>
> Hello resteasy-dev,
>
> I am trying to use the new JAX-RS 2.0 @Suspended AsyncResponse mechanism to
> write
> a service that expects many idling connections (awaiting an event via
> long-poll),
> and therefore seems like a good candidate for asynchronous responses, so as
> not
> to use a large number of waiting threads.
>
> The resource code is very simple:
>
> @GET
> @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
> public void watchForChanges(
> @Suspended AsyncResponse asyncResponse,
> @QueryParam("since") long since)
> {
> controller.watchForChanges(since, asyncResponse::resume);
> }
>
> The intent is that watchForChanges places the (inferred)
> Consumer<ResponseObject> on a queue,
> and returns immediately. Later on a background thread comes by and
> completes the request.
>
> However, when testing with say 20 clients, it sure looks like the end
> result is still a
> thread per request model:
>
>
> "qtp1718322084-43" - Thread t@43
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING
> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> - parking to wait for <3537ebd5> (a
> java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch$Sync)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
> at
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:836)
> at
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:997)
> at
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1304)
> at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:231)
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousExecutionContext$SynchronousAsynchronousResponse.initialRequestThreadFinished(SynchronousExecutionContext.java:127)
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:411)
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invokePropagateNotFound(SynchronousDispatcher.java:247)
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.ServletContainerDispatcher.service(ServletContainerDispatcher.java:225)
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.FilterDispatcher.doFilter(FilterDispatcher.java:62)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1676)
> <snip Jetty handler / filter chain>
> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:319)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:253)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:273)
> at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:95)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.io.SelectChannelEndPoint$2.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:93)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.executeProduceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:303)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.produceConsume(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:148)
> at
>
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.ExecuteProduceConsume.run(ExecuteProduceConsume.java:136)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:671)
> at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:589)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
>
> The concept of a "SynchronousAsynchronousResponse" and implementation of
in
> particular SynchronousDispatcher#invoke seem to be totally not what I
> want:
> /**
> * Callback by the initial calling thread. This callback will
> probably do nothing in an asynchronous environment
> * but will be used to simulate AsynchronousResponse in vanilla
> Servlet containers that do not support
> * asychronous HTTP.
> *
> */
>
request.getAsyncContext().getAsyncResponse().initialRequestThreadFinished();
>
>
> What am I doing wrong? How do I get truly asynchronous processing?
>
> This is with RESTEasy 3.0.18 running on Jetty 9.3.11
>
> Thanks for any advice,
> Steven
_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
resteasy-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev