May 2014 - arquillian-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1773) JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method

by Mattias Persson (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Mattias Persson updated ARQ-1773: --------------------------------- Steps to Reproduce: See attached file, Maven dependency according to: <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.jboss.arquillian</groupId> <artifactId>arquillian-bom</artifactId> <version>1.1.4.Final</version> <scope>import</scope> <type>pom</type> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> Testclass according to: package se.shouldfailtest; import org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment; import org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.Archive; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.ShrinkWrap; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.asset.EmptyAsset; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.spec.WebArchive; import org.junit.Before; import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; @RunWith(Arquillian.class) public class ShouldFailTest { @Deployment public static Archive<?> createDeployment() { WebArchive war = ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class, "test.war") .addAsWebInfResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml"); return war; } @Before public void preparePersistenceTest() throws Exception { throw new Exception("Test should fail when exception is thrown in @Before..."); } @Test public void shouldFail() throws Exception { //This test will pass in 1.1.4.Final but not in 1.1.3.Final (as expected). assertTrue(false); } } was: Maven dependency according to: <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.jboss.arquillian</groupId> <artifactId>arquillian-bom</artifactId> <version>1.1.4.Final</version> <scope>import</scope> <type>pom</type> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> Testclass according to: package se.shouldfailtest; import org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment; import org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.Archive; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.ShrinkWrap; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.asset.EmptyAsset; import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.spec.WebArchive; import org.junit.Before; import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; @RunWith(Arquillian.class) public class ShouldFailTest { @Deployment public static Archive<?> createDeployment() { WebArchive war = ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class, "test.war") .addAsWebInfResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml"); return war; } @Before public void preparePersistenceTest() throws Exception { throw new Exception("Test should fail when exception is thrown in @Before..."); } @Test public void shouldFail() throws Exception { //This test will pass in 1.1.4.Final but not in 1.1.3.Final (as expected). assertTrue(false); } } > JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARQ-1773 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1773 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Base Implementation > Affects Versions: 1.1.4.Final > Reporter: Mattias Persson > Attachments: arquillian_test_should_fail.zip > > > When an exception is thrown from a method with @Before, tests that should fail actually pass when using Arquillian 1.1.4.Final. When stepping down to 1.1.3.Final, the tests fail as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1773) JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method

by Mattias Persson (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Mattias Persson updated ARQ-1773: --------------------------------- Attachment: arquillian_test_should_fail.zip Project for reproducing error > JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARQ-1773 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1773 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Base Implementation > Affects Versions: 1.1.4.Final > Reporter: Mattias Persson > Attachments: arquillian_test_should_fail.zip > > > When an exception is thrown from a method with @Before, tests that should fail actually pass when using Arquillian 1.1.4.Final. When stepping down to 1.1.3.Final, the tests fail as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1773) JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method

by Mattias Persson (JIRA)

Mattias Persson created ARQ-1773: ------------------------------------ Summary: JUnittests pass when exception is thrown from @Before-annotated method Key: ARQ-1773 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1773 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Base Implementation Affects Versions: 1.1.4.Final Reporter: Mattias Persson When an exception is thrown from a method with @Before, tests that should fail actually pass when using Arquillian 1.1.4.Final. When stepping down to 1.1.3.Final, the tests fail as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1771) Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances

by Stefan Miklosovic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Stefan Miklosovic resolved ARQ-1771. ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: drone_2.0.0.Alpha2 Resolution: Rejected > Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARQ-1771 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Extension - Drone > Affects Versions: drone_2.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Stefan Miklosovic > Fix For: drone_2.0.0.Alpha2 > > > I have a test case like this > {code} > @RunWith(Arquillian.class) > @RunAsClient > public class SomeTestCase > { > @Drone > @Mobile > @Custom > private WebDriver mobile; > // tests > } > {code} > where @Custom is just an annotation: > {code} > @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) > @Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER }) > public @interface Custom { > } > {code} > it is _not_ annotated with @Qualifier. > Realize that the same problem arise when using @OperateOnDeployment from Arquillian which is not annotated with @Qualifier neither. > I am getting this: > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=i9DVqeaC > You see that InstrumentationPerformDecider.decidePerformingInstrumentation observes BeforeDroneInstantiated so when it is treated twice, you are going to instantiate two Drones which is another argument why Drone does it wrong. > When I declare Drone injection like that, it results into two instances of WebDrivers so that means it instruments Android package twice with two Selendroids so that mean I am getting NoUniqueWebDriverException when I want to start some activity because from now on you have "by accident" two webdrivers instrumenting the same deployment as a result of a bug where putting custom annotation on Drone instantiates it twice. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1771) Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances

by Stefan Miklosovic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Stefan Miklosovic commented on ARQ-1771: ---------------------------------------- The problem was that in a test project there was a page object used which has injected webdriver in it. Injection of Drone was like {code} class TestCase { @Drone @Mobile @Custom AndroidDriver mobile; } {code} and page object was like {code} class PageObject { @Drone @Mobile AndroidDriver mobile; } {code} So Graphene could not resolve that Drone injection point for page object since there is not such point - there is a point which is additionally annotated by @Custom, but there is not such point which is annotated only by these two annotations (@Drone and @Mobile). What we are missing here is some kind of resolution and guessing what is "enough" to know in order to inject something into a page object. Imagine you have 2 browsers so they are annotated by @Drone @Chrome and @Drone @Firefox and injected into a test. Additionally you have page object - that abstraction is independent from the choice of browsers so it would be enough to use just @Drone in page object and you are not changing your page object model at all. > Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARQ-1771 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Extension - Drone > Affects Versions: drone_2.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Stefan Miklosovic > > I have a test case like this > {code} > @RunWith(Arquillian.class) > @RunAsClient > public class SomeTestCase > { > @Drone > @Mobile > @Custom > private WebDriver mobile; > // tests > } > {code} > where @Custom is just an annotation: > {code} > @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) > @Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER }) > public @interface Custom { > } > {code} > it is _not_ annotated with @Qualifier. > Realize that the same problem arise when using @OperateOnDeployment from Arquillian which is not annotated with @Qualifier neither. > I am getting this: > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=i9DVqeaC > You see that InstrumentationPerformDecider.decidePerformingInstrumentation observes BeforeDroneInstantiated so when it is treated twice, you are going to instantiate two Drones which is another argument why Drone does it wrong. > When I declare Drone injection like that, it results into two instances of WebDrivers so that means it instruments Android package twice with two Selendroids so that mean I am getting NoUniqueWebDriverException when I want to start some activity because from now on you have "by accident" two webdrivers instrumenting the same deployment as a result of a bug where putting custom annotation on Drone instantiates it twice. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1772) Arquillian Debug does not print real event class

by Karel Piwko (JIRA)

Karel Piwko created ARQ-1772: -------------------------------- Summary: Arquillian Debug does not print real event class Key: ARQ-1772 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1772 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Base Implementation Affects Versions: 1.1.4.Final Reporter: Karel Piwko When using inheritance to define events, Arquillian Debug prints out following: {code} (E) PrepareDrone (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (O) DroneConfigurator.prepareDrone (E) DroneConfigurationEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) DroneConfigurationEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) Before (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (O) DroneLifecycleManager.before (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (O) DroneEnhancer.enhanceDrone (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (E) DroneLifecycleEvent (O) EventRegisterObserver.register (O) DroneEnhancer.enhanceDrone {code} Which is not really super useful, as debug log can't show what actual events were fired. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1771) Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances

by Stefan Miklosovic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Stefan Miklosovic commented on ARQ-1771: ---------------------------------------- It seems that DroneTestEnricher#ensureInjectionPointPrepared parse Drone point without custom annotation, only @Drone and annotations with @Qualifier are treated so it thinks that @Drone @Mobile @Custom is different from @Drone @Mobile so it instantiates it for the second time with missleading log message. > Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARQ-1771 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Extension - Drone > Affects Versions: drone_2.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Stefan Miklosovic > > I have a test case like this > {code} > @RunWith(Arquillian.class) > @RunAsClient > public class SomeTestCase > { > @Drone > @Mobile > @Custom > private WebDriver mobile; > // tests > } > {code} > where @Custom is just an annotation: > {code} > @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) > @Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER }) > public @interface Custom { > } > {code} > it is _not_ annotated with @Qualifier. > Realize that the same problem arise when using @OperateOnDeployment from Arquillian which is not annotated with @Qualifier neither. > I am getting this: > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=i9DVqeaC > You see that InstrumentationPerformDecider.decidePerformingInstrumentation observes BeforeDroneInstantiated so when it is treated twice, you are going to instantiate two Drones which is another argument why Drone does it wrong. > When I declare Drone injection like that, it results into two instances of WebDrivers so that means it instruments Android package twice with two Selendroids so that mean I am getting NoUniqueWebDriverException when I want to start some activity because from now on you have "by accident" two webdrivers instrumenting the same deployment as a result of a bug where putting custom annotation on Drone instantiates it twice. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1771) Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances

by Stefan Miklosovic (JIRA)

Stefan Miklosovic created ARQ-1771: -------------------------------------- Summary: Putting custom annotation on Drone creates multiple instances Key: ARQ-1771 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1771 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Extension - Drone Affects Versions: drone_2.0.0.Alpha1 Reporter: Stefan Miklosovic I have a test case like this {code} @RunWith(Arquillian.class) @RunAsClient public class SomeTestCase { @Drone @Mobile @Custom private WebDriver mobile; // tests } {code} where @Custom is just an annotation: {code} @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Target({ ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER }) public @interface Custom { } {code} it is _not_ annotated with @Qualifier. Realize that the same problem arise when using @OperateOnDeployment from Arquillian which is not annotated with @Qualifier neither. I am getting this: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=i9DVqeaC You see that InstrumentationPerformDecider.decidePerformingInstrumentation observes BeforeDroneInstantiated so when it is treated twice, you are going to instantiate two Drones which is another argument why Drone does it wrong. When I declare Drone injection like that, it results into two instances of WebDrivers so that means it instruments Android package twice with two Selendroids so that mean I am getting NoUniqueWebDriverException when I want to start some activity because from now on you have "by accident" two webdrivers instrumenting the same deployment as a result of a bug where putting custom annotation on Drone instantiates it twice. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1644) Arquillian Persistence doesn't work with embedded/Local containers

by Bartosz Majsak (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Bartosz Majsak updated ARQ-1644: -------------------------------- Description: Because of the way its Extensions are written arquillien-extension-persistence doesn't work with Local containers (tested with OpenEJB, need hack like [the one mentiong in the blog|http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/arquillian-persistence-a...]) (was: Because of the way its Extensions are written arquillien-extension-persistence doesn't work with Local containers (tested with OpenEJB, need hack like http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/arquillian-persistence-and-em... > Arquillian Persistence doesn't work with embedded/Local containers > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ARQ-1644 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1644 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Enhancement > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Extension - Persistence > Affects Versions: persistence_1.0.0.Alpha6 > Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau > Assignee: Bartosz Majsak > > Because of the way its Extensions are written arquillien-extension-persistence doesn't work with Local containers (tested with OpenEJB, need hack like [the one mentiong in the blog|http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/arquillian-persistence-a...]) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-1644) Arquillian Persistence doesn't work with embedded/Local containers

by Bartosz Majsak (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Bartosz Majsak commented on ARQ-1644: ------------------------------------- [Working sample|https://github.com/rmannibucau/persistence-with-openejb-and-arquil...] shared by [~rmannibucau] > Arquillian Persistence doesn't work with embedded/Local containers > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ARQ-1644 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1644 > Project: Arquillian > Issue Type: Enhancement > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Extension - Persistence > Affects Versions: persistence_1.0.0.Alpha6 > Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau > Assignee: Bartosz Majsak > > Because of the way its Extensions are written arquillien-extension-persistence doesn't work with Local containers (tested with OpenEJB, need hack like [the one mentiong in the blog|http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/arquillian-persistence-a...]) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

arquillian-issues May 2014